Equality, Freedom, Education (9): Survival of the Fittest Should Not be the Basis of Universal Public Education

This updated re-post is a response to Make Public Education a Market Economy—Not a Socialist One (Education Week, 2018) by Gary Wolfram, a professor at Hillsdale College, a small Christian institution that is a significant beneficiary of the largess of the DeVos Family.

Universal public education today finds itself squarely in the middle of an over two-century-long blood war between the Army of Liberty and the Army of Equality. At first blush, most Americans would accept that Equality (Justice) and Liberty (Freedom) are the foundation of our Democracy. Unfortunately, (as explained in The War between Equality and Liberty) Liberty and Equality are in direct opposition to one another.

Equality requires that those who are better off in a society provide a portion of their income to support the less well off. Doing so impinges upon Liberty because it denies the possessors of wealth from doing whatever it is they want to do with their money.

Conceptually born with the French Revolution, the current manifestation of this war in America is being waged between the Army of Equality (Progressive Democrats) and the Army of Liberty (Conservative Republicans); Professor Wolfram is clearly a card-carrying member of the latter. What Wolfram has written is an elaboration of the mantra the Republican Army of Liberty contrived as a battle cry when it decided to support the voucher: replacing universal public education with a market-based educational system will help the poor by providing parents the Liberty to choose better schools for their children.

The truth is, advantaged conservatives are not interested in equality; they are interested in acting upon this frequent complaint: “I’m tired of my money being wasted on failing schools.” Instead of an honest explanation of their intent, the Army of Liberty has created a subterfuge in order to preserve their money so they can do with it whatever they want. After decades of personal experience in the public and private sectors, I am certain about three things when it comes to advantaged conservatives; in general:

1) the majority would profess to be Christians but do not give a damn about the poor;

2) they have such a sense of their own exceptionalism that they believe the average American is sufficiently ignorant that s/he will buy their illogical and immoral protestations without question;

3) they are so isolated in their physical and/or social enclaves of wealth that they are dysfunctionally ignorant about the scope and ramifications of poverty in this country.

Regarding the third assertion: there are nearly 70,000 children living in Deep Poverty (living at or below half of the designated poverty level) in Philadelphia alone. Having experience working with the parents of disadvantaged children, I can assure you that without direct, compassionate assistance too many of these parents would be unable to take advantage of any free market system of education that the Army of Liberty might contrive.

Conservatives know this, but they do not care; in fact, systemic complexity is a way to increase the probability that their children will not have to encounter poor children. And when those thousands of children in Deep Poverty are left to fend for themselves without a prayer of hope in an urban world that will continue to increasingly resemble a primitive world of fang and claw, Conservatives will march away from responsibility while chanting a mantra that is a lie: “We gave them a choice.”

Fault also lies at of the feet of the Army of Equality because Progressives have failed to understand what leaders in other developed nations around the world do understand:

1) above a given baseline (e.g. it helps to be able to pay schools’ electric bills), there is not a causative relationship between money spent per pupil and student achievement, but…

2) there is a direct relationship between the consistent and thorough application of research-based educational practices and student achievement.

American Public Education’s failure to ensure pursuit of and compliance with the latter point may be the greatest failure of the Army of Liberty: it supports the view that the teachers in public education should have the unfettered freedom to decide what it is that should be taught and how it should be taught regardless of whether or not the “how” utilizes research-based best practices. Again, I rely upon my decades of experience in the field of American Education to strongly suggest that the vast majority of America’s teachers are so poorly trained and so poorly supervised that the likelihood of best practices being implemented in schools populated by the poor is nearly nil.

It is this last point that should be the focus of massive reform, and not a devolution into a market-based system of education, which would end up being anything but public. As Conservatives continue to offer their cavalier hypocrisies about a market-based educational system, which will never improve education for the masses of poor children in this country, they should heed this warning from JFK’s Inaugural Address: “If a free society cannot help the many who are poor, it cannot save the few who are rich.”

We do not need a market-based system of education; we need to make effective the educational system we have. Relying upon the free market to improve education for all is disingenuous and cynical because it can and should be argued that the underlying cause of poverty in the developed world is, after all, a direct result of the Survival of the Fittest mentality that underlies free-market Capitalism.


This is the 9th of several posts that I will be updating and reposting in an attempt to refine and arrange all of my education-related posts in a logical, conceptual order. As always, your comments will be much appreciated.

Click on the image above to order a trade paperback, eBook, or hardback of Myers, which is Volume 1 of the Myers/Benton Chronicles

The images of the students and of “Karl Myers” are copyright free images from Pixabay. No copyright infringement is intended, nor is there an intent on the part of the blogger to monetize the use of the featured images in this post.

Click on the image above to learn more about Jeff Lee’s Literary Creations

Dear Reader: your “follow” will be most appreciated (click “Menu” in this post to do so), as will forwarding this post’s link to a friend who you think might enjoy the blog. Thanks!